Nowadays, people are beginning to use home robots in their daily lives. These modern devices are becoming more popular thanks to technological development. However, besides their benefits, home robots also bring certain drawbacks.

On the one hand, using home robots has several advantages. Firstly, they can help people save time by doing household chores such as cleaning, cooking, or washing dishes. As a result, people can focus more on work, study, or relaxing. Secondly, home robots are especially useful for the elderly or busy individuals, as they provide support and make daily tasks easier. In addition, robots can work continuously without getting tired.

On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to owning home robots. The most obvious problem is their high cost, which makes them unaffordable for many families. Moreover, over-reliance on robots may make people lazier and less active. There is also a risk of technical problems or breakdowns, which can cause inconvenience.

In conclusion, home robots can make our lives easier and more comfortable, but they also have some limitations that should be carefully considered.

The charts compare the main sources of news for teenagers, young adults, and old people. Overall, younger people tend to rely more on online news, while older generations prefer traditional media, especially TV.

For teenagers, online news sites are the most popular source, accounting for 52%, followed by TV at 37%. Printed newspapers and other sources are much less common, at 7% and 4% respectively. Among young adults, the distribution is more balanced: TV (35%) and online news (33%) are nearly equal, while others make up 26% and printed newspapers only 6%.

In contrast, old people rely heavily on TV, which represents 42% of their news consumption. Printed newspapers are also significant at 29%, while online news is the least preferred at just 6%. Others account for 23%. This shows a clear shift from traditional to digital media across generations.

The line graph shows population trends in Viet Nam from 1960 to 2020, comparing the proportions of people living in rural and urban areas. Overall, the rural population declined steadily, while the urban population increased over the same period.

In 1960, most Vietnamese people lived in rural areas, accounting for about 85% of the population, whereas only 15% lived in cities. However, from 1960 to 1980, the rural population fell slightly to around 81%. From 1990 onwards, this decrease became more noticeable, dropping to 70% in 2010 and reaching approximately 63% by 2020.

By contrast, the urban population rose throughout the same period. In 1960, it stood at just 15%, increasing gradually to 19% in 1980. From 1990, urbanisation accelerated, with the figure climbing to 30% in 2010 and peaking at 37% in 2020.

The line graph shows population trends in Viet Nam from 1960 to 2020, comparing the proportions of people living in rural and urban areas. Overall, the rural population declined steadily, while the urban population increased over the same period.

In 1960, most Vietnamese people lived in rural areas, accounting for about 85% of the population, whereas only 15% lived in cities. However, from 1960 to 1980, the rural population fell slightly to around 81%. From 1990 onwards, this decrease became more noticeable, dropping to 70% in 2010 and reaching approximately 63% by 2020.

By contrast, the urban population rose throughout the same period. In 1960, it stood at just 15%, increasing gradually to 19% in 1980. From 1990, urbanisation accelerated, with the figure climbing to 30% in 2010 and peaking at 37% in 2020.

In many public and school restrooms, people often leave the lights on and the water running after use. Although this habit may seem minor, it leads to a serious waste of electricity and clean water over time. As a result, energy bills increase and valuable natural resources are unnecessarily consumed.

There are several reasons for this problem. Firstly, some people are simply careless or in a hurry and forget to turn off the lights or taps. Secondly, a lack of awareness about environmental protection makes them underestimate the consequences of their actions. In some cases, old facilities without automatic systems also contribute to the issue.

To address this problem, several solutions can be implemented. Schools and public buildings should install motion-sensor lights and automatic faucets to reduce waste. In addition, clear reminder signs can be placed in restrooms to encourage responsible behavior. Finally, organizing short campaigns or talks about saving energy and water would help raise awareness among users.

In conclusion, by combining technology, education, and personal responsibility, the waste of electricity and water in restrooms can be significantly reduced.