Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
There are complaints that bad news overwhelms our television. Some people think that television news should be a mixture of good and bad news. I absolutely support the idea.
First of all, it is understandable that the majority of television news being reported is bad news, such as: wars, famines, accidents and crime. There is a saying: Joy is easy to forget and sadness is easy to remember. The bad news often disturbs us and makes us curious. The more views from the audience, the more profitable the media organizations are.
However, in terms of psychological and medical concerns, if people are frequently exposed to bad news, they will also be affected mentally, gradually they become over-anxious and suspicious. A more dangerous thing is a lack of faith in life. If so, it is getting more and more difficult for us to see good things than to see bad things.
While it is true that most of our media used to be bad news, it is undeniable that the attractiveness of many significant news programs like Loving Leaves (Cặp lá yêu thương - a volunteer program on VTV); news about anti-epidemic doctors who work day and night to protect societal health; ...
Sum up, I believe that in order to have a rich and meaningful life, we need to have a multi-dimensional perspective. Good news and bad news are both pieces of life and need to be harmonized in the media to bring an authentic, objective and appropriate view to audience.
It is thought by some people that there should be a mixture of good and bad news on television. Personally, I completely agree with this view.
The majority of television news being reported is bad news: wars, famines, accidents, and crime. It is obvious that bad news, by its nature, is appealing to people. Their attention can be achieved by broadcasting negative news. People want to know more about wars and criminal behaviors as opposed to peace and good deeds in their community.
However, it is undeniable that bad news have negative impact on people's lives. If the media publishes too much bad news, people will be left feeling hopeless and anxious. They can be stressed and under pressure after reading such type of news.
Thus, the news should report the good happening in the world alongside the bad. Good news such as stories about someone’s achievements, successful personalities, and positive contributions can encourage others to work hard. Some programs about building shelters for the homeless, donating clothes for the poor and so on, these should be shown on TV as well.
In brief, if the media establishes the balance between both types of news, the society will be harmonious and peaceful. This will prevent anxiety and insecurity among the viewers.
I agree that life skills should be taught to young people at school along with traditional subjects like math and science.
First of all, we need to know what life skills are? Life skills are actions derived from things that people have been learned to respond effectively to situations or interact appropriately with those around them. So it is a very essential thing for life. For example, if we are injured, the life skill is to help us know how to bandage the wound or when there is a fire or an earthquake, it helps us to know how to escape. If we don't learn life skills, then we will have rude behavior in public places, from not knowing how to give room to the elderly to jostling each other when shopping, etc. Survival skills are the attitudes that manifest every day in life, it will be very difficult if we do not apply it on a regular basis to become good habits. But on the contrary, if we care and express ourselves in every situation, from greetings, dear ... to learning how to organize learning, playing and doing a good thing every day then everything will become simple, natural.
First of all, you should appreciate yourself, know how to equip yourself with skills to protect yourself. Then know how to respect the rules of society and take care of others. Just every day you do a good thing and do a good deed, even though simple and small, you will gradually equip yourself with skills in a safe and happy life!
We all know that life skills are very important, and my parents usually say that they are even more important than traditional subjects, such as maths, science, ... And in real life, there are many opinions about what things are more necessary. Therefore, I highly agree with this statement. And here are some reasons.
Firstly, life skills are really vital for all children, even after they graduate. Here are some of my definitions of life skills. From my point of view, any skill that is useful for one's life, such as tidying the room, cleaning the house, using a computer, etc..., can be a life skill. So, life skills are very important for each person's life. And if children study about life skills, after graduating school, they can be self-confident and they will successfully deal with every changes and challenges.
Secondly, with life skills, children can determine their life. As I have noted, small but necessary skills can be life skills, so if children don't know any skills or they can only do simple things, their living capital can be limited, so they must always have someone to help them. I think this is not really reasonable, because it means that children always depend on someone, and their lives will be very mechanical - they can't do what they want themselves.
In short, although traditional subjects provide children a large amount of knowledge, life skills must be taught together with those subjects. So, totally agree with the statement!
I will talk about my story, I met and made a wonderful friend before when I was in 6th grade. She was very pretty, did well in math and resembled me in every way. We used to have a lot of good memories together. But after one year of school, she moved to HCM city. I later looked at her profile, I saw a lot of beautiful pictures posted between us. No matter how far apart, we still contact each other and hang out together in the summer colors ... now she has gone abroad to study, but I still hope one day she will come find me .
Hello everyone, everyone must have had an interesting and memorable adventure in life. Me too, today I will tell you about an exciting adventure of mine. That day was Sunday, my family and I went to visit Bai Dinh pagoda - Ninh Binh. We got in the car at 3:30 a.m. and arrived around 6 o'clock. First we went to visit the temple, I learned that this place, more than 1000 years ago, was the temporary capital of the Dinh during the construction of Hoa Lu capital and then acted as one of The "four towns" of Hoa Lu capital. Also here, under the Ly dynasty, National Master Nguyen Minh Khong built a monkhood, used to cure diseases to save people, especially the cure for the cure of tigers for King Ly Than Tong. is one of the centers of Buddhism (worshiping Buddha), religion (worshiping Cao Son), worshiping Mother (mother Lieu Hanh). After that, my family and I went into the caves, of course we got a lot of good memories. After visiting the pagoda, we went to visit Trang An river and saw in the bottom of the small boat, the scene was very romantic. The feeling of being in nature, listening to wild birds, not having to worry about work or study, is so enjoyable. Going deep will have to paddle through shimmering stalactites caves, with many different shapes. Until about 5 pm, we returned home. This tour will leave me a lot of joy and happiness. I will never forget it.
Dear my friend!
As you know that since the outbreak of Covid, we have suffered great consequences and many people have suffered losses to their lives and many other things !! In my country, the influence of Covid-19 is not at all light, when I translated Covid to my city, I was very worried and impatient. The government has told and advised people not to go out, and wear masks ... Then then we started to be more careful when going out, to wear masks, That made me very is annoying because it was not very comfortable and can be said that it messed up my life and everyone in the country, and I had to learn through Zoom, after all that time I found it ineffective because studying on Zoom makes me not very focused and makes the lesson difficult to understand for me, what I tell you is true and if possible I want to advise everyone to keep health because we still have to fight this epidemic is quite long and everyone should follow all the rules that the government, everyone has set out to repel this epidemic.
I hope I will speak with you soon !!
Dear my friend!
Surely you also know about the Covid 19 epidemic and its heavy effects, right? To be honest, in Vietnam, we are not affected much by the pandemic, but we are also aware of its danger, so we take precautions by wearing masks and hand washing antiseptic. But recently, in Hai Duong, there were cases of infection in the community, and gradually, more and more cases of infections appeared, and more and more people were F1, F2 (people in contact with Covid 19 infected people.) more. Not only that, the epidemic broke out on the occasion of the Lunar New Year, so we must be more conscious of preventing the spread of epidemic. Students must study online, workers struggle on difficult days, and doctors work day and night to fight the epidemic. Even so, there are still some people who are unconscious and take advantage of it to do bad things. Bad deeds deserve condemnation and good deeds deserve praise. So, let's join hands together to repel translation, so that our life can return to normal as before ! Let's fight off a terrifying plague together !
Hope we will have a chance to talk longer! See you again !
Bạn tham khảo nhé !!
Parents can be the best teacher for every child coming on this earth. I agree with this statement as no learning institution can be compared with the parents as they are role models for their children since they open their eyes in this world till they are fully grown up and matured.
To start with when the child is born he sees his parents as his guide, mentor & teacher who will teach him how to speak, eat, drink, live, wear, interact etc. No one will be with him when he is crying for anything it will be the parents who will be with him for every problem and his / her every need. Even during his education days he will observe and learn that the school although is the learning institution but the moral & ethical values learned from parents are far greater than any learning center and parents will be the one who wants the children to be the best in this world and they want their children not to repeat the mistakes that they have done in their lives which any learning institution won’t care for as they can’t give individual attention to every student.
On the other hand, we see that generally the children who are orphans or could not get the attention from their parents don’t have that foundation of ethical, moral and social values as compared to the ones who have been trained by their parents despite all of them have gone to schools, colleges etc. The only difference between them is parents.
If the parents are not well educated they could still prove to be good teachers for their children but that will be of less fruitful from the highly educated parents as educated and learned parents will have more vision and more horizon as compared to the unlearned.
I would like to conclude with the statement that parents can be a turning point for his child if he tries to teach every step of living this life.
I do not agree on computer learning. Although learning on computers, although helping learners to be more flexible in the fields of technology and creativity, there are still many negative aspects, not meeting the learning needs of students:
First, the quality of learning via the Internet cannot be compared with the traditional way of learning - which creates better interaction between students and teachers, managed, questioned, evaluated.
Second, online training can cause social isolation, because school is not only a place to learn but also a place where they come to socialize, make new friends and learn more communication experiences.
Third, this form creates an unevenness among localities. For children who have full learning equipment, have a sense of self-study and good family management, it works. Those children with difficult and unmanaged conditions will learn to cope.
While the benefits of learning online are obvious, it's important to remember that not all courses can be taught online. Therefore, online training should be seen as a complementary and extensible approach to classical forms of learning.
I half agree with this opinion. Why?
Schools have considered the second house where the children can study, play and join the extracurricular activities. In the school, the student can learn all the subject to expand their knowledge, do the exams... and specially, they can play with their friends. But sometime, study too much make they feel stress, yeah, I know this
Study on Internet has some advantages: they can learn by the photos, stories, songs... and they can stop when they want. But, it has many disadvantage. The children are too young to choose the information on Internet, which need to know or needn't. The Internet has many temptation like: games, cartoons... make they can't forcus on study if their parents won't monitoring them, use to much or to long time the electronic device can make their eyes have many problems.
With many reasons, the Internet just help 40 percents the children on study. I think schools have many advantage than study on Internet
Các em lưu ý cấu trúc viết bài Writing chứ không phải chỉ trả lời câu hỏi nhé.
Thầy cô Tiếng Anh của Hoc24 sẽ chữa bài cho các em kèm theo đưa ra một số bài mẫu tham khảo để các bài viết sau các em làm tốt hơn, từ đó đạt điểm cao hơn trong các kì thi Tiếng Anh.
Các em có chờ đợi chuyên mục [Chữa writing] ra đời không? Giơ tay cô xem nào :D
Làm thư hả cô
dịch ra là:Bạn đồng ý hay không đồng ý với nhận định sau đây?
Trong tương lai, trường học không còn cần thiết nữa vì trẻ em có thể lấy thông tin từ Internet. Sử dụng lý do cụ thể và ví dụ để hỗ trợ câu trả lời của bạn.
dịch ra là:Bạn đồng ý hay không đồng ý với nhận định sau đây?
Trong tương lai, trường học không còn cần thiết nữa vì trẻ em có thể lấy thông tin từ Internet. Sử dụng lý do cụ thể và ví dụ để hỗ trợ câu trả lời của bạn.
I do not agree on computer learning. Learning on the computer sounds useful, but when learning on the computer, we can see it dull our mind (the students), no longer eager to learn because when we encounter difficult lessons, we Once copied and finished, studying at school is still better, why?
1) Because when studying there, we can be taught by the teacher and conveyed the precious experiences that the teachers have learned.
2) It helps us to improve on learning and learning, which is the part that computers cannot. Although the use of computers or information technology much in the future is inevitable, I hope we can still promote learning in school.
t làm xong r
đúng là người giỏi anh có khác
Tốn 15 p để làm :)
on ở đầu →with
Đúng r mà
Learning on the computer sounds useful
Nghĩa Học ở trên máy tính nghe có vẻ khá là thú vị
Cho em sửa phần 2 ạ
2) It helps us to improve on learning and social, which is the part that computers cannot. Although the use of computers or information technology much in the future is inevitable, I hope we can still promote learning in school.
a) In my opinion, that is completely wrong. Because schools are so important, this will be a place where students can communicate knowledge, consulting information from the Internet cannot replace future schools. In the future, the Internet is just a form of reference and schools will be the place to transmit necessary knowledge to students.
b) So what is the reason we should study in school?
-The Internet can be said to be very useful, but it seems to be lacking in many ways, but when we are in school we will be taught with a lot of knowledge by our teachers.
-The teachers will always be by our side, teaching a lot about the world out there that computers are still incapable of doing.
Thay cho em từ Learning thứ 2 thành social
em
ô ki cô
vâng
Dạ có ạ :D Nếu được thì tốt quá, vì em viết ý không tốt lắm với lại câu cú vớ vẩn lắm :<
cô ơi
I disagree with that statement because:
+ Children at home self-study on the Internet have advantages and disadvantages. The downside of children using the internet for improper purposes such as playing games, surfing facebook, ...
+ Children who stay at school and do not go to school will make them less communication, inexperienced, not have many friends
👍👍👍
Bỏ 1 Although ở câu 2
half agree with this opinion. Why?
Schools have considered the second house where the children can study, play and join the extracurricular activities. In the (bỏ)school, the student can learn all the subjects to expand their knowledge, do the exams... and especially, they can play with their friends. But sometimes, study too much make them feeling stress, yeah, I know this
Study on Internet has some advantages: they can learn by the (bỏ)photos, stories, songs... and they can stop when they want. But, it has many disadvantages. The children are too young to choose the information on Internet, which need to know or needn't. The Internet has many temptations like games, cartoons... make them can't focus on study if their parents won't monitoring them, use too much or to the long time the electronic device can make their eyes have many problems.
for many reasons, the Internet just helps 40 percent of the children in the study. I think schools have many advantages than study on the Internet
I disagree with having students study online without going to school. because it will cause:- Teachers won't know what their students are doing.- Because only studying online, maybe the love of teachers and friends will be faded.- Because Internet learning requires computers, it will damage our eyesso students need to go to school to learn every day.
EM
Adults always say: "Your school is your second home". No one wants to live far from home, right? So, I highly disagree with this statement.
Today, I will talk about 3 ideas, and they are:
a) Children can easily be distracted from studying when they are using the internet to learn.
b) While studying on the Internet, children can get access to bad content.
c) If children don’t go to school, they can’t get used to the competitive world.
Coming to my first idea. Many primary and secondary students say that they can't concentrate on their online classes. Why? Because teachers can't directly see what his/her students are doing outside the class. They can watch videos on Youtube, play video games, or listening to music while learning. And that's the things that are really happening in an online class, where teachers can manage their students a little bit. So what can happen when children study online without any teachers, without any control from anybody? I think they can't really study because they will chat with their friends online or do anything they like after only a few seconds. So I think that's not a good idea. Opposed to that, when children study at school, their teachers will directly know what they are doing in the lesson; therefore, teachers can admonish or have punishment on them. So, in the first idea, I succeed in proving that children can easily be distracted from studying when they are using the internet to learn.
As I have said in the first part, in some online classes, children can watch videos or play video games when studying online. But now, cyberspace is really dangerous. There are plenty of bad videos or video games. So what will happen if children click on that type of video or play that type of video game? They will have bad ideas, and it leads to aberrant behavior. When children watch those bad things, they will feel guilty and they really need help. However, as a survey, 75% of children in Vietnam say that they don’t know the hotline to call for help. So, it’s a very serious problem when children study on the Internet. But, at school, they don’t have to face these problems, and even if they deal with the problems, teachers can help them. So, while studying on the Internet, children can get access to bad content.
Now, the third party. At school, the score is the thing that can help teachers compare this student with that one, and it also helps students to compare with each other. The students with lower scores will recognize that they need to try more, and the students with higher scores will try to have their best scores. That makes big competitiveness in each student. But, on the other side of the idea, children when learning on the Internet can only receive the knowledge, and nothing can make each child know that where they are in the knowledge world. There aren’t any comparisons here, so when they come to the world, they will be confused because they don’t know whether they do better or worse than another one next to him/them. They will lose their advantages and keep their disadvantages, so this is not good for them.
So, in every part of my speech, I prove to you all that we shouldn’t let children use the Internet to study to replace the school. Highly oppose!
Line 12th from the end of the speech up to the beginning, party => part. Sorry for this mistake!
em
Em nữa